Approve Referendum 67: Make the Insurance Industry Treat Consumers Fairly.

Latest News

New poll shows Referendum 67 still too close to call

KING-5
A new poll released just 24 hours before election day shows Referendum 67, a controversial law aimed at requiring insurance companies to make good on their policies or face triple-damage lawsuits, is still too close to call.

Cartoon: Record Money on R-67

Election 2007: Strong views on both sides of insurance claims measure

Columbian
Insurance companies say the passage of Referendum 67 will only raise rates for everyone statewide, including businesses that pay auto, property and liability premiums.  Advocates, on the other hand, say passing R-67 will protect consumers and businesses from unreasonable delays and denials of insurance claims.

Referendum 67 race heats up

The Olympian

State insurance commissioner Mike Kreidler says the insurance-industry lobby is badly distorting history in its effort to counter the newest hard-hitting ad in the Referendum 67 campaign.


Pro: Subject insurers to law

Bellingham Herald

How much do you pay for insurance every month? For most families, insurance for your home, car or business is a huge chunk of the monthly budget. After paying your insurance premiums year after year, you shouldn’t have to worry whether or not your insurance company will be there when you need them.


An open letter to state House Speaker Frank Chopp

HorsesAss Blog

Dear Frank, The insurance industry has already spent $11.1 million to defeat R-67, apparently, a new state record. And yet, the race is still too close to call. I think you’ll agree that this suggests that given an even playing field, voters would approve R-67 by a comfortable margin.


Editorial: Referendum 67: Protect consumers

Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Our elections this month are a lesson in dirty politics, be it between Seattle City Council candidates (yes, David Della and Tim Burgess, we're talking to you) or opposing sides of a given issue, such as Referendum 67.


Already too many laws

Columbian

I believe we have too many laws. My rule of thumb is a "no" vote on all referendums, measures, resolutions, and any other big word that means a new law or constitutional complication (aka taxes). I do have exceptions regarding Referendum 67.